//
you're reading...
Human rights, Islamic Absurdities, Women in Islam

Women under Sharia Law

11th Century North African Qur’an in the Briti...

Image via Wikipedia

Books have been published alleging the equality of women in Islam. Now there may be many so-called “Islams”, but when you compare what is foisted on the pubic with the Islam of Mohammed in the Qur’an and hadiths, the contrast is great.

Sharia, or Islamic Law, has been seriously proposed as the answer to the world’s problems. Even in Great Britain, India, and Canada, people have proposed Muslims in those countries should be under Sharia Law. Sharia Law is based on the Qur’an and the hadiths. But what are some of the teachings of Sharia law on women?

 How Are Women Inferior in Muslim Society?

“’O women! Give alms, as I have seen that the majority of the dwellers of Hell-fire were you (women).’ They asked, ‘Why is it so, O Allah’s Apostle?’ He replied, ‘Your curse frequently and are ungrateful to your husbands. I have not seen anyone more deficient in intelligence and religion than you…. The women asked, ‘O Allah’s Apostle? What is deficient in our intelligence and religion?’ He said, ‘Is not the evidence of two women equal to the witness of one man?’ They replied in the affirmative. He said, ‘This is the deficiency in your intelligence. Isn’t it true that a woman can neither pray nor fast during her menses? The women replied in the affirmative. He said, ‘This is the deficiency in your religion.’” Bukhari vol.1 no.301 p.181. See also Sahih Muslim vol.2 book 4 no.1982,1983 p.432.

Women and Property

When one is given a woman, servant, or cattle, one should seize its forehead and pray to Allah. Ibn-i-Majah vol.3 no.1918 p.157. See  also Muwatta’ Malik 28.22.52

Women are Not Half as Intelligent

According to the Muslim Sharia (Law), the witness of a woman is equal half that of a man, “because of the deficiency of the woman’s mind.” (Bukhari vol.3 no.826 p.502) Mohammed said that a nation will never succeed that makes a woman their ruler (Bukhari vol.9 no.219 p.170-171).

The worst thing is not that Muslim writers would be considered male chauvinist pigs for saying that women have deficient minds. The really sad thing is that an educated Pakistani woman with a high-tech job was trying to explain to me why this was true.  Galatians 3:28 “There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.”

Women In the Eyes of Islamic Law

The Qur’an in Sura 2:282 says, “…And get two witnesses, Out of your own men. And if there are not two men, Then a man and two women, Such as ye choose, For witnesses, So that if one of them errs, The other can remind her….”

“Narrated Abu Sai’id Al-Khudri: The Prophet said, ‘Isn’t the witness of a woman equal half of that of a man?’ The women said, ‘Yes.’ Hesaid, ‘This is because of the deficiency of the woman’s mind.” Bukhari vol.3 no.826 p.502. So if a Muslim man were to rape a Muslim woman, the man’s word would count twice as much as the woman’s. The word of a nonMuslim does not count at all in a court of law against a Muslim. Muslim man rapes a nonMuslim woman, even if a second non-Muslim woman is present, his word (that he did not do it) would count equal to the word of both of them.

The Human Rights Commission of Pakistan said in an annual report that one woman is raped every three hours in Pakistan. Even worse, 72% of all women in police custody in Pakistan are physically and sexually abused. The Woman’s Action Forum says that 75% of all women in jail are under the charge of “zina” (fornication). It was never stated how many men, if any, were in jail for that. See Why I Am Not A Muslim p.324 for information and examples.

Temporary Marriage

“Narrated Jabir bin ‘Abdullah and Salama bin Al’Akwa, “While we were in an army, Allah’s Apostle came to us and said, ‘You have been allowed to do the Mut’a (marriage) so do it.’ Salama bin Al-Akwa said: Allah’s Apostle said, ‘If a man and a woman agree (to marry temporarily), their marriage should last for three nights, and if they like to continue, they can do so; and if they want to separate, they can do so. I do not know whether that was only for us or for all the people in general Abu ‘Abdullah (Al-Bukhari) said: ‘Ali made it clear that the Prophet said, ‘The Mut’a marriage has been cancelled (made unlawful).’” Bukharivol.7 book 62 no.52 p.37

According to the hadiths and Sunni Muslims, Mohammed later forbade temporary marriage an the Day of Khaibar, fairly late in Mohammed’s career. However, according to Shi’ite Muslims, it was never forbidden and is still practiced today.

Mustahill / Muhallil (No Equivalent in English)

A divorced woman cannot remarry the same man until she has consummated a marriage with someone else. Bukhari vol.7 book 63 no.186,187 p.136; Abu Dawud vol.2 no.2192 p.592-593

Note that if a man remarries the same woman, he does not need to consummate a marriage with anybody. When a man “irrevocably” divorces a woman, she must consummate a marriage with someone else before they can get back together again. Ibn-i-Majah vol.3 no.1933-1936 p.165-168. There is no such strange rule for a man.  Abu Dawud vol.2 no.2302 p.629 also discusses the disgusting role of a mustahil in Islamic society.

Rifaa ibn Simwal divorced his wife Tamima (irrecovability, 3 times) and she married another who could not consummate the married. Later Rifaa want to marry her again, but Mohammed said Rifaa could not until Tamima consummated a marriage with someone else. Muwatta’ Malik 28.7.17

A’isha said that Mohammed said a man and women could not remarry after an irrevocably divorce until the woman had consummated a marriage with someone else. Muwatta’ Malik 28.7.17 Yahah related that Malik said similar. Muwatta’ Malik 28.7.19

Other Sharia Gender Rules 

Men cannot wear silk; this includes silk ties. (Bukhari vol.7 book 72 no.720 p.482; Sahih Muslim vol.4 book 29 no.6038 p.1314)

Men cannot wear yellow clothing: (Sahih Muslim vol.3 book 22 no.5173-5178 p.1146; Ibn-i-Majah vol.5 no.3603-3604 p.90-91)

Women cannot wear wigs of artificial hair. (Bukhari vol.7 no.133 p.101; Sahih Muslimvol.3 book 22 no.5297-5306 p.1165-1166; Muwatta’ Malik 51.1.2)

 Women cannot have false hair or alter their teeth. Ibn-i-Majah vol.3 no.1987-1989 p.196-197

Women cannot have false hair, alter teeth, or remove facial hair. Bukhari vol.6 no.408 p.380.

No birth control (Sahih Muslim vol.1 footnote p.66).

 In the mosque, the woman’s place is in the back Sahih Muslim vol.1 book 4 no.880-881 p.239

On circumcision for girls, Muslim legal experts disagree according to the Abu Dawudvol.3 footnote 4257 p.1451. It is neither endorsed nor forbidden in the Qur’an.  It is implied that females are circumcised in  Muwatta’ Malik 2.19.73-77

Enhanced by Zemanta
Advertisements

About Bjorn EnFiddle

I used to believe in Islam and recite the Quran without knowing a single meaning of the words. Today I am an apostate of Islam, and today i read the Quran and Hadith to know more about Islam. The more I learn the more I hate Islam. I do not believe in a god who has emotional problems over the actions of humans. I do not believe in a god who would ask to kill, and treat women like a sex toy.

Discussion

15 thoughts on “Women under Sharia Law

  1. The hadith states that the Prophet [ upon him blessings and peace ] , addressed a group of women in the mosque, saying: I have not seen any one more deficient in intelligence and religion than you. A cautious, sensible man could be led astray by some of you.” The women asked: “O Allah’s Apostle, what is deficient in our intelligence and religion ?” He said: “Is not the evidence of two women equal to the witness of one man ?” They replied in the affirmative. He said: “This is the deficiency of your intelligence”… “Isn’t it true that a woman can neither pray nor fast during her menses ?” The women replied in the affirmative. He said: “This is the deficiency in your religion.”3

    It’s meaning is not literal: The hadith here uses two figures of speech: the first is hyperbole [ mubalagha ] meaning exaggeration in the words “even a prudent, sensible man might be led astray by some of you” i.e. a fortiori an ordinary man. The second figure is synechdoche [ majaz mursal ] consisting in using the whole for the part: intelligence to mean the specific legal testimony of a woman, and religion to mean the prayer and fast at the time of menses. Numerous verses and other narrations stress that the reward of women equals that of men even if their acts differ. So this particular narration is not meant literally but as an acknowledgment of the inordinate power women wield over men while ostensibly “less active” in the “public” and “spiritual” spheres.

    Posted by Hannah | August 1, 2011, 10:05 PM
    • wow quite the analytic, why dont you do the same for all the Hadith, and than you will see what im talking about

      Posted by Bjorn EnFiddle | August 2, 2011, 11:29 AM
      • According to the Muslim Sharia (Law), the witness of a woman is equal half that of a man, “because of the deficiency of the woman’s mind.” (Bukhari vol.3 no.826 p.502) Mohammed said that a nation will never succeed that makes a woman their ruler (Bukhari vol.9 no.219 p.170-171).

        Imam Bukhari in his Jami does not only collect Hadiths but at the same time he is trying to prove his opinions on fiqh which is known as fiqhul bukhari fi tarajimihi. Therefore, Imam bukhari might bring the same Hadith a number of times to prove different things from it, however, in doing this he does not bring the full Hadith, but chops the irrelevant bits off so that it doesnt drag and goes straight to the point. This in hadith terminology is known as taqteeul hadith.

        Again I repeat: This injunction does not imply woman’s inferiority to man; rather it has more to do with justice than to gender.
        Prophet, peace be upon him, says, “Women are full sisters of men.” In the Arabic text, the Prophet, peace be upon him, uses here a word, which implies total similarity and equivalence. Hence, the Prophet’s statement suggests no inferiority attached to women. The Qur’an and the Sunnah assign the same duties to both men and women, and promise them the same reward. If this does not mean the same status, I would like to know what does.

        Islamic history abounds with examples of great women who have made great contribution to the progress of mankind. This is very clear to anyone who is well informed about the status of women during the time of the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, and the early generations. Allah’s Messenger (peace be upon him) attested to the perfect character of four women: Mary, Âsiyah the wife of Pharaoh, Fâtimah, and Khadîjah. He was referring to their good character, strength of intellect, and soundness of opinion.

        During the battle of Al-Jamal (in which A’isha, the Prophet’s widow, led an army in opposition to Ali, the fourth Caliph), Allah benefited me with a word. When the Prophet heard the news that the people of Persia had made the daughter of Khorsrau their queen (ruler), he said, “Never will such a nation succeed as makes a woman their ruler.” [24]

        The Persian rulers at the time of the prophet (P) showed enmity toward the Prophet (P) and toward his messenger to them. The Prophet’s response to this news may have been a statement about the impending doom of that unjust empire, which did not take place later, and not about the issue of gender as it relates headship of the state in itself. Z. Al-Qasimi argues that one of the rules of interpretation known to Muslim scholars is that there are cases in which the determing factor in interpretation is the specificity of the occasion (of the hadith and not the generality of its wording. Even if the generality of its wording is to be accepted, that does not necessarily mean that a general rule is applicable, CATEGORICALLY, to any situation. As such, the hadith is not conclusive evidence of categorical exclusion.

        The worst thing is not that Muslim writers would be considered male chauvinist pigs for saying that women have deficient minds. The really sad thing is that an educated Pakistani woman with a high-tech job was trying to explain to me why this was true. Galatians 3:28 “There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.”

        The sad thing is that you’re not listening to what she’s saying. Why would she defend a religion that is degrading her even though she’s educated?

        Posted by Hannah | August 2, 2011, 5:07 PM
      • The Qur’an in Sura 2:282 says, “…And get two witnesses, Out of your own men. And if there are not two men, Then a man and two women, Such as ye choose, For witnesses, So that if one of them errs, The other can remind her….”
        “Narrated Abu Sai’id Al-Khudri: The Prophet said, ‘Isn’t the witness of a woman equal half of that of a man?’ The women said, ‘Yes.’ H esaid, ‘This is because of the deficiency of the woman’s mind.” Bukhari vol.3 no.826 p.502. So if a Muslim man were to rape a Muslim woman, the man’s word would count twice as much as the woman’s. The word of a nonMuslim does not count at all in a court of law against a Muslim. Muslim man rapes a nonMuslim woman, even if a second non-Muslim woman is present, his word (that he did not do it) would count equal to the word of both of them.

        I could not help but laugh at this. First of all it’s called “witness” not “victum” nor “offender”. Which means your little scenario here does not apply. Second of all why did you cut the beginning of the translation of the verse from suraat albaqaraa:

        Believers, when you make a deal for a loan for a prescribed period of time, write down the agreement. A scribe should write down the agreement between you, with justice. The scribe should not refuse to write it down, as God gave him the knowledge of writing. So he must write it down. The debtor should dictate the writing and [while doing so,] he must fear God, his Lord [and dictate it justly] and not reduce any part of the amount. If the debtor is not of a sound mind or is weak or is in any other way incapacitated to dictate the agreement, then his guardian may dictate [the terms on his behalf] with justice. Make two of your men a witness on this agreement. In case two men are not available, then a man and two women. Such witnesses as you choose. [Two women in place of one man have been advised, so] that if one of them errs, the other may remind her. The witnesses should not refuse when they are called to testify.” (Al-Baqarah 2: 282)

        This verse relates specifically to witnesses on a document. The choice in the case of witnesses on a document is with those who are a party to the contract that is being written down in the document. For example, if I have to write a sale deed for my house, I am free to choose the persons, whom I want to make witnesses thereof. However, on the other hand, the choice of witnesses to a crime or to an accident or to any scene is not with any individual. Whoever – whether man, woman or child – is present and has seen the incident may stand as a witness thereof. There is absolutely no relationship between the two kinds of witnesses. In the first case, the decision is in our own hands. We may appoint the person of our choice as a witness on a document. While in the second case, the decision is not in our hands. Whoever is present at the scene shall and can be taken as a witness thereof. Thus we cannot say that the witness of a woman in cases other than witnessing a document will be affected by this verse.

        Posted by Hannah | August 2, 2011, 5:09 PM
      • The Human Rights Commission of Pakistan said in an annual report that one woman is raped every three hours in Pakistan. Even worse, 72% of all women in police custody in Pakistan are physically and sexually abused. The Woman’s Action Forum says that 75% of all women in jail are under the charge of “zina” (fornication). It was never stated how many men, if any, were in jail for that. See Why I Am Not A Muslim p.324 for information and examples.

        The Hudood Ordinance was a law in Pakistan that was enacted in 1979 as part of then-military ruler Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq’s Islamization and replaced or revised in 2006 by the Women’s Protection Bill. The Hudood Law was intended to implement Islamic Shari’a law, by enforcing punishments mentioned in the Quran and sunnah for Zina (extramarital sex) Qazf (false accusation of zina), Offence Against Property (theft), and Prohibition (of alcohol consumption).

        The ordinance is mostly criticized for equiparating the crime of zina (adultery) and zina bil-jabr (rape). As for the zina, a woman alleging rape is required to provide four adult male eyewitnesses. In many cases, the failure to find such proof of the rape places the woman at risk of prosecution for zina.[4][5] Moreover, to prove rape the female victim has to state that sexual intercourse had taken place, which can then be viewed judicially as an admission of guilt on her own part, rather than as evidence of rape (see blaming the victim).If the alleged offender, however, is acquitted for want of further evidence the woman now faces charges for either adultery, if she is married, or for fornication, if she is not married. According to a report by the National Commission on Status of Women(NCSW) “an estimated 80% of women” in jail in 2003 were there as because “they had failed to prove rape charges and were consequently convicted of adultery.”[6]

        Am not even going to argue about this rubbish the government of Pakistan is committing.

        In islam: For married Muslims, the maximum for zina is death by stoning. For unmarried couples it is lashes.
        MY country LASHES/STONES females who are allegedly claimed to have commited adultery in the ABSCENSE of 4 witnesses saying that they’re doing it under the Shariaa law. Where are the 4 witnesses that the quraan mentioned? We the citizens all know that our government is corrupt and are practicing religion the way THEY want it to be. But does that mean that my country or the government of pakistan are true muslims and hence I should think twice about being a muslim?!

        Posted by Hannah | August 2, 2011, 5:11 PM
        • “Narrated Jabir bin ‘Abdullah and Salama bin Al’Akwa, “While we were in an army, Allah’s Apostle came to us and said, ‘You have been allowed to do the Mut’a (marriage) so do it.’ Salama bin Al-Akwa said: Allah’s Apostle said, ‘If a man and a woman agree (to marry temporarily), their marriage should last for three nights, and if they like to continue, they can do so; and if they want to separate, they can do so. I do not know whether that was only for us or for all the people in general Abu ‘Abdullah (Al-Bukhari) said: ‘Ali made it clear that the Prophet said, ‘The Mut’a marriage has been cancelled (made unlawful).’” Bukharivol.7 book 62 no.52 p.37
          According to the hadiths and Sunni Muslims, Mohammed later forbade temporary marriage an the Day of Khaibar, fairly late in Mohammed’s career. However, according to Shi’ite Muslims, it was never forbidden and is still practiced today.

          Mut`ah marriage was initially permitted because the Muslims were passing through what might be called a period of transition from Jahiliyyah (the pre-Islamic period) to Islam. Fornication was widespread among the Arabs before the advent of Islam. After Islam, when Muslims were required to go on military expeditions, they were under great pressure as a result of being away from their wives for long periods of time. Some of the believers were strong in faith, but others were weak. The weak in faith feared that they would be tempted to commit adultery, which is a major sin, while the staunch in faith, on the contrary, were ready to castrate themselves. Ibn Mas`ud narrates: “We were on an expedition with the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) and did not have our wives with us, so we asked Allah’s Messenger (peace and blessings be upon him) ‘Should we not castrate ourselves?’ (The reason for this request was the desire to preserve their chastity, which was in danger of being affected by their unmet needs.) He forbade us from doing so but permitted us to contract marriage with a woman up to a specified date, giving her a garment as a dowry (Mahr).” (Reported by Al-Bukhari and Muslim)
          We may recall that the Qur’an adopted a gradual course in prohibiting wine and usury, as these two evils were widespread and deeply rooted in the pre-Islamic society. In the same manner, the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) adopted a gradual course in the matter of sex. First, he permitted mut`ah marriage as an alternative to zina (fornication and adultery), and at the same time coming closer to the permanent marriage relationship. He then prohibited it absolutely, as all and many other Companions reported. Muslim reports this in his Sahih (Authentic Collection of Hadiths), mentioning that Al-Juhani was with the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) at the conquest of Makkah and that the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) gave some Muslims permission to contract mut`ah marriages. Al-Juhani said: “Before leaving Makkah, the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) prohibited it.” In another version: “Allah has made it Haram until the Day of Resurrection.”
          Shi’ite Muslims = They believe in things we do not. So what they think is not of concern to us.

          Posted by Hannah | August 2, 2011, 5:13 PM
      • A divorced woman cannot remarry the same man until she has consummated a marriage with someone else. Bukhari vol.7 book 63 no.186,187 p.136; Abu Dawud vol.2 no.2192 p.592-593
        Note that if a man remarries the same woman, he does not need to consummate a marriage with anybody. When a man “irrevocably” divorces a woman, she must consummate a marriage with someone else before they can get back together again. Ibn-i-Majah vol.3 no.1933-1936 p.165-168. There is no such strange rule for a man. Abu Dawud vol.2 no.2302 p.629 also discusses the disgusting role of a mustahil in Islamic society.
        Rifaa ibn Simwal divorced his wife Tamima (irrecovability, 3 times) and she married another who could not consummate the married. Later Rifaa want to marry her again, but Mohammed said Rifaa could not until Tamima consummated a marriage with someone else. Muwatta’ Malik 28.7.17
        A’isha said that Mohammed said a man and women could not remarry after an irrevocably divorce until the woman had consummated a marriage with someone else. Muwatta’ Malik 28.7.17 Yahah related that Malik said similar. Muwatta’ Malik 28.7.19

        The verse was revealed to counter a disgusting practice of the ignorant pre- Islamic Arabic arab men who had such little regard for the sanctity of marriage that they would divorce their wives repeatedly, treating them worse than property. The concept of remarrying another person before you can return to remarry your ex- partner is more a warning to the ignorant fool who treated women unjustly by divorcing them repeatedly.
        Divorce in religions is generally unacceptable.

        Posted by Hannah | August 2, 2011, 5:14 PM
      • Other Sharia Gender Rules
        I don’t see what the point of mentioning these is.

        Inconclusion: I still dont see what you’re talking about. And I wont, ever, alhamdulilah.

        Posted by Hannah | August 2, 2011, 5:23 PM
  2. Brother alot of these Hadiths are misinterpreted because they are brought out of context. Women in Islam are valued. A whole suraa is dedicated to them. The witness of a woman is not clarified in terms of being half that of a man, it is said that 2 women are needed for further encouragement and protection of these women by having 2 rather than 1 because by nature we are emotional and standing in court is pretty tough.

    Please dont read literal translations. Lest you read the stories behind the descent of the verses of the quraan in an extended manner do not come up with hasty conclusions.

    Posted by Hannah | August 1, 2011, 10:16 PM
    • misinterpreted? lol but if the same guy have interpreted a good thing on the next verse you believe it, for you to accept something bad in islam is not an option, and you will attack the authencity of it, even if its true you muslims try to sugar coat islam by saying nonsense like “misinterpretation” “wrong translation” or just, your making it look bad” please grow up, this is the true islam, swallow and digest it, cos it is the truth

      Posted by Bjorn EnFiddle | August 2, 2011, 11:31 AM
      • I am attacking authenticity because you are not bringing the whole picture of the story. Bring it all to me. Then tell me if im biased or not. So yes i say again: stop misinterpreting. You do not know anything about islam let alone knowing whats true and whats not.

        Posted by Hannah | August 2, 2011, 5:34 PM
    • When one is given a woman, servant, or cattle, one should seize its forehead and pray to Allah. Ibn-i-Majah vol.3 no.1918 p.157. See also Muwatta’ Malik 28.22.52

      Exodus 20:17 lists the last of the Ten Commandments: “Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour’s.” Must Christian females be offended?
      Must I take offence for being mentioned in the same sentence as a servant or a cattle?! The Hadith implies that we are a blessing just like a cattle or a servant that should be prayed upon when we’re given to a man.

      Posted by Hannah | August 2, 2011, 5:05 PM
  3. English-French-Italian-Greek-Hebrew-Hungarian-Arabic-German-Dutch-Indonesia

    This is from a decision of law applicable to the Torah (Old Testament). According to human history that has happened to us all is well that the woman had fallen into sin and influence men and fall together into sin. But all that has been passed by the forgiveness of sins in the sacrifice of Jesus to the law of love toward man and his life partner (female).

    So if we all live by love, then we can all understand the circumstances of life depends on the circumstances of life itself, for we are all created in accordance with their respective talents, and have the same brain to think. We all learn from things that empty into one, and so on and so forth. The law of love that Jesus taught is useful for us to see each other that we are all no more and no less than others (all the same degree).

    You and I are the same, we both have three personalities:
    1). Personality of the Body,
    2). Personality of the Soul,
    3). and Personality of the Spirit. This does not forget that we are created equal with the image of God. Only the difference between the human spirit and the Holy Spirit (Allah/God). God merciful, so that the human world is still there. Who is merciful in this world? Surely you and I know the story that fact.
    ———————————————————————————————————————————————

    French:

    Ceci est d’une décision de droit applicable à la Torah (Ancien Testament). Selon l’histoire humaine qui nous est arrivé est tout ainsi que la femme était tombée dans le péché et les hommes d’influence et tombent ensemble dans le péché. Mais tout ce qui a été adopté par le pardon des péchés par le sacrifice de Jésus à la loi d’amour envers l’homme et sa partenaire de vie (femelle).

    Donc, si nous vivons tous par l’amour, alors nous pouvons tous comprendre les circonstances de la vie dépend des circonstances de la vie elle-même, car nous sommes tous créés en conformité avec leurs talents respectifs, et ont le même cerveau pour réfléchir. Nous apprenons tous des choses qui se déversent dans un, et ainsi de suite et ainsi de suite. La loi de l’amour que Jésus a enseigné est utile pour nous de voir les uns les autres que nous sommes tous ni plus ni moins que d’autres (tous le même degré).

    Vous et moi sommes les mêmes, nous avons trois personnalités à la fois:
    1). Personnalité de l’Organe,
    2). Personnalité de l’âme,
    3). et de la personnalité de l’Esprit. Cela ne signifie pas oublier que nous sommes créés égaux à l’image de Dieu. Seule la différence entre l’esprit humain et l’Esprit Saint (Allah / Dieu). Dieu miséricordieux, afin que le monde humain est toujours là. Qui est miséricordieux dans ce monde? Sûrement vous et je sais que l’histoire de ce fait.
    ———————————————————————————————————————————————-

    Italian:

    Si tratta di una decisione della legge applicabile al Torah (Antico Testamento). Secondo la storia umana che è successo a noi tutti è bene che la donna era caduta nel peccato e gli uomini influenza e cadono insieme nel peccato. Ma tutto ciò che è stata approvata dal perdono dei peccati nel sacrificio di Gesù per la legge d’amore verso l’uomo e il suo compagno di vita (femmina).

    Quindi, se noi tutti viviamo per amore, allora tutti noi possiamo capire le circostanze della vita dipende dalle circostanze della vita stessa, perché siamo tutti creati in conformità con i loro rispettivi talenti, e hanno lo stesso cervello di pensare. Tutti noi impariamo dalle cose che si svuotano in uno, e così via e così via. La legge dell’amore che Gesù ha insegnato è utile per noi vedere l’un l’altro che siamo tutti né più né meno di altri (tutti lo stesso grado).

    Tu e io siamo uguali, abbiamo entrambi tre personalità:
    1). Personalità del Corpo,
    2). Personalità dell’Anima,
    3). e personalità dello Spirito. Questo non dimenticare che siamo stati creati uguali con l’immagine di Dio. Solo la differenza tra lo spirito umano e lo Spirito Santo (Allah / Dio). Dio misericordioso, perché il mondo umano è ancora lì. Chi è misericordioso in questo mondo? Sicuramente voi e so che la storia che fatto.
    ——————————————————————————————————————————————–

    Greek:

    Αυτό είναι από μια απόφαση του εφαρμοστέου δικαίου για την Τορά (Παλαιά Διαθήκη). Σύμφωνα με την ανθρώπινη ιστορία που έχει συμβεί σε όλους μας είναι πολύ καλά ότι η γυναίκα είχε πέσει στην αμαρτία και τους άνδρες να επηρεάσουν και να πέσουν μαζί στην αμαρτία. Αλλά όλα αυτά που έχει περάσει από την συγχώρεση των αμαρτιών στη θυσία του Ιησού για το νόμο της αγάπης προς τον άνθρωπο και το σύντροφο της ζωής του (θηλυκό).

    Έτσι, αν ζούμε όλοι με αγάπη, τότε μπορούμε όλοι να κατανοήσουμε τις συνθήκες της ζωής εξαρτάται από τις συνθήκες της ίδιας της ζωής, γιατί είμαστε όλοι δημιουργούνται σύμφωνα με τις αντίστοιχες ταλέντα τους, και έχουν το ίδιο μυαλό να σκεφτεί. Όλοι μαθαίνουμε από τα πράγματα που αδειάζουν σε μία, και ούτω καθεξής και ούτω καθεξής. Ο νόμος της αγάπης που δίδαξε ο Ιησούς είναι χρήσιμο για εμάς να δούμε ο ένας τον άλλον ότι είμαστε όλοι τίποτα περισσότερο και τίποτα λιγότερο από τους άλλους (όλοι στον ίδιο βαθμό).

    Εσείς και εγώ είμαστε το ίδιο, έχουμε και οι δύο έχουν τρεις προσωπικότητες:
    1). Προσωπικότητα του σώματος,
    2). Προσωπικότητα της ψυχής,
    3). Προσωπικότητα και του Πνεύματος. Αυτό δεν ξεχνάμε ότι είμαστε ίσοι με την εικόνα του Θεού. Μόνο η διαφορά μεταξύ του ανθρώπινου πνεύματος και του Αγίου Πνεύματος (Αλλάχ / Θεός). Ο Θεός ελεήμων, έτσι ώστε ο ανθρώπινος κόσμος είναι ακόμα εκεί. Ποιος είναι ελεήμων σε αυτόν τον κόσμο; Σίγουρα εσείς και ξέρω την ιστορία αυτό το γεγονός.
    ——————————————————————————————————————————————–

    Hebrew:

    זו מן החלטה של ​​הדין החל על התורה (הברית הישנה). על פי ההיסטוריה האנושית שקרה לכולנו היטב כי האישה נפלה לתוך החטא גברים להשפיע ליפול יחד לתוך החטא. אבל כל זה כבר עבר מחילה על חטאים ההקרבה של ישו החוק של אהבה כלפי האדם שותף חייו (נקבה).

    אז אם כולנו חיים על אהבה, ואז נוכל כולנו להבין את הנסיבות של החיים תלוי בנסיבות של החיים עצמם, כי אנו נוצרים והכל בהתאם הכישרון שלהם, ויש להם את אותו מוח לחשוב. כולנו ללמוד דברים ריק לתוך אחד, וכן הלאה וכן הלאה. חוק האהבה שישוע לימד שימושי לנו לראות זה את זה שכולנו לא יותר ולא פחות מאחרים (כולם באותה מידה).

    אתה ואני דומים, שנינו יש שלושה אישים:
    1). אישיות של הגוף,
    2). אישיות של הנשמה,
    3). ואישיותו של הרוח. זה לא לשכוח שאנחנו שווים עם דמותו של אלוהים. רק ההבדל בין רוח האדם ורוח הקודש (אללה / אלוהים). אלוהים רחום, כך שהעולם האנושי עדיין שם. מי רחום בעולם הזה? הרי אתה ואני יודעים את הסיפור למעשה.
    ——————————————————————————————————————————————–

    Hungarian:

    Ez a döntés az alkalmazandó jog a Tóra (Ószövetség). Szerint az emberi történelem, ami történt velünk minden rendben van, hogy a nő esett bűnbe és befolyásolják a férfiak és ősszel össze bűn. De mindez már elhaladt a bűnök bocsánatát a áldozatot Jézus a szeretet törvénye iránt az ember és az ő élettársa (női).

    Tehát, ha élünk a szerelem, akkor mindannyian megérteni a körülmények az élet körülményeitől függ magának az életnek, mert mindannyian összhangban létrehozott saját tehetsége, és ugyanolyan agy gondolkodni. Mindannyian tanulhatunk a dolgok, hogy üres egyetlen, és így tovább és így tovább. A törvény a szeretet, hogy Jézus tanított hasznos, hogy lássuk egymást, hogy mindannyian nem több és nem kevesebb, mint mások (az összes ugyanolyan mértékben).

    Te és én azonos, mindketten három személyiségek:
    1). Személyiség A Testület,
    2). Személyiség A lélek,
    3). Személyiség-és a Lélek. Ez nem elfelejteni, hogy egyforma az Isten képmására. Csak a különbség az emberi lélek és a Szentlélek (Allah / Isten). Isten irgalmas, hogy az emberi világban még mindig ott van. Ki irgalmas ebben a világban? Bizonyára te és én ismerem a történetet, tény.
    ——————————————————————————————————————————————

    Arabic:

    هذا هو قرار من القانون المنطبق على التوراة (العهد القديم). وفقا للتاريخ البشري الذي حدث لنا هو كل شيء جيدا أن المرأة قد سقطت في الخطيئة ورجال النفوذ وتقع في الخطيئة معا. ولكن تم تمرير كل ذلك من خلال مغفرة الخطايا في ذبيحة يسوع لقانون الحب تجاه الرجل وشريكة حياته (أنثى).

    حتى إذا كنا جميعا نعيش الحب ، ثم يمكننا أن نفهم كل ظروف الحياة يعتمد على ظروف الحياة نفسها، ليتم إنشاؤها جميعا وفقا لمواهبهم الخاصة ، ولها نفس الدماغ على التفكير. ونحن نعلم جميعا من الأمور التي تصب واحد ، وهلم جرا وهكذا دواليك. قانون الحب الذي علم يسوع هو مفيد بالنسبة لنا أن نرى بعضنا البعض أننا جميعا لا أكثر ولا أقل من غيرها (كل نفس الدرجة).

    أنت وأنا هي نفسها ، كل منا يملك ثلاث شخصيات :
    1). السمات للهيئة،
    2). شخصية الروح ،
    3). والشخصية للروح. هذا لا ننسى أن يتم إنشاء ونحن على قدم المساواة مع صورة الله. فقط الفرق بين الروح الإنسانية والروح القدس (الله / الله). الله الرحمن الرحيم ، حتى أن عالم الإنسان لا يزال هناك. الذي هو رحيم في هذا العالم؟ بالتأكيد أنت وأنا نعرف قصة تلك الحقيقة.
    ——————————————————————————————————————————————-

    German:

    Dies geht aus einer Entscheidung des anwendbaren Rechts, die Tora (Altes Testament). Nach der Geschichte der Menschheit, die uns passiert ist, alles ist gut, dass die Frau hatte in Sünde und des Einflusses Männer gefallen und fallen zusammen in Sünde. Aber all das wurde durch die Vergebung der Sünden in das Opfer Jesu, das Gesetz der Liebe zu den Menschen und seine Lebensgefährtin (weiblich) verabschiedet worden.

    Also, wenn wir von Liebe leben, dann können wir alle verstehen, die Umstände des Lebens hängt von den Umständen des Lebens selbst, denn wir alle in Einklang mit ihren jeweiligen Talenten erstellt wurden, und haben die gleiche Gehirn zu denken. Wir alle von den Dingen, die in eine leer, und so weiter und so fort zu lernen. Das Gesetz der Liebe, die Jesus lehrte, ist nützlich für uns gegenseitig, um zu sehen, dass wir alle nicht mehr und nicht weniger als andere (alle den gleichen Grad).

    Du und ich, sind die gleichen, wir haben beide drei Persönlichkeiten:
    1). Personality of the Body,
    2). Personality of the Soul,
    3). und Persönlichkeit des Heiligen Geistes. Dies gilt nicht vergessen, dass wir gleich geschaffen sind mit dem Bild von Gott. Nur die Differenz zwischen dem menschlichen Geist und dem Heiligen Geist (Allah / Gott). Gott ist barmherzig, so dass die menschliche Welt ist immer noch da. Wer ist in dieser Welt gnädig? Sicher haben Sie und ich kennen die Geschichte dieser Tatsache.
    ——————————————————————————————————————————————-

    Dutch:

    Dit is van een beslissing van de wet van toepassing is op de Torah (Oude Testament). Volgens de menselijke geschiedenis, dat is er gebeurd met ons allen is goed dat de vrouw was gevallen in zonde en de invloed van mannen en vallen samen in zonde. Maar dat is goedgekeurd door de vergeving van de zonden in het offer van Jezus aan de wet van de liefde jegens de mens en zijn leven partner (vrouw).

    Dus als we allemaal leven door de liefde, dan kunnen we begrijpen allemaal dat de omstandigheden van het leven hangt af van de omstandigheden van het leven zelf, want wij zijn allemaal gemaakt in overeenstemming met hun respectieve talenten, en hebben dezelfde hersenen om na te denken. Wij allen leren van dingen die in een lege, en zo verder en zo voort. De wet van de liefde die Jezus ons leerde is nuttig voor ons om elkaar te zien dat we allemaal niet meer en niet minder dan anderen (allen in dezelfde mate).

    Jij en ik zijn hetzelfde, we hebben allebei drie persoonlijkheden:
    1). Persoonlijkheid van het lichaam,
    2). Persoonlijkheid van de ziel,
    3). en de persoonlijkheid van de Geest. Dit betekent niet vergeten dat we gelijk zijn geschapen met het beeld van God. Alleen het verschil tussen de menselijke geest en de Heilige Geest (Allah / God). God genadig, zodat de menselijke wereld er nog steeds is. Wie is barmhartig in deze wereld? Zeker jij en ik weet het verhaal dat feit.
    ——————————————————————————————————————————————–

    Indonesian:

    Susann Pattoka Ini adalah dari pengambilan dari hukum yang berlaku pada Taurat (Perjanjian Lama). Menurut sejarah manusia yang telah terjadi pada kita semua adalah betul bahwa perempuan telah jatuh dalam dosa dan mempengaruhi lelaki dan jatuh bersama-sama kedalam dosa. Tetapi semua itu telah berlalu dengan pengampunan dosa manusia atas pengorbanan Yesus dengan hukum kasihNya terhadap manusia dengan pasangan hidupnya (wanita).

    Sehingga apabila kita semua hidup berdasarkan kasih, maka kita semua dapat mengerti keadaan hidup tergantung dengan situasi hidup itu sendiri, sebab kita semua diciptakan sesuai dengan talenta masing-masing, dan mempunyai otak yang sama untuk berpikir. Kita semua belajar dari hal yang kosong menjadi 1, dan seterusnya, dan seterusnya. Hukum kasih yang diajarkan Yesus adalah berguna untuk kita melihat sesama bahwa kita semua tidak lebih dan tidak kurang dari orang lain (semua sama derajat).

    Kau dan aku adalah sama, kami berdua memiliki tiga kepribadian:
    1). Kepribadian Tubuh,
    2). Kepribadian Jiwa,
    3). dan Kepribadian Roh. Ini tidak lupa bahwa kita diciptakan sama dengan gambar Allah. Hanya perbedaan antara roh manusia dan Roh Kudus (Allah/Tuhan). Allah yang pemurah, sehingga dunia manusia masih ada. Siapa yang murah hati di dunia ini? Tentunya Anda dan saya tahu cerita yang sebenarnya.

    Posted by Paul Bastian Souisa | August 2, 2011, 11:38 AM

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: